« Berofsky on Global Control | Main | Even better than latkes and Xmas fruitcake! »

11/28/2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Eric Schwitzgebel

A few people (including some contributors to this site) have queried me about why I excluded philosophy of action, free will, and moral psychology entries from my lists; and about whether I might do a list specifically on those topics.

My answer has to do with the specific purpose for which I composed the lists: To compare rates at which ethics books are stolen, vs. books in philosophy of mind and language. I excluded philosophy of action and moral psychology from the analysis because those areas seemed problematically intermediate between mind and ethics -- though maybe sociologically closer to ethics. And also, now that I have the two lists, I've fulfilled the purpose for which the lists were created -- though others are welcome to manufacture their own lists in different areas!

Given the exclusion of action and moral psychology, the appearance of Fischer and Wolf on the ethics lists is of course all the more impressive.

Eric Schwitzgebel

To clarify: I excluded SEP entries on action and moral psychology, not books. So if a book on free will made it into a lot of straight ethics entries, it made my list.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment