« Mini-Free Will Conference at UBC | Main | Compatibilist skeptics »

03/05/2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0120a8bb6b2e970b01310f771aa6970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Backlogged?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Brian Weatherson

My information is a little out of date, but until very recently at least the Philosophical Review satisfied this condition.

Some of the Kluwer journals (such as Synthese) appear to meet a version of the condition. It is a very short time between acceptance and being in e-print on the website, quite a long time between acceptance and paper production. Since no one actually subscribes to the paper version of Synthese any more, maybe that's close enough for present purposes.

(Of course, I suspect Philosophers' Imprint does very well by this (and every other) criteria. But you probably knew this!)

Neil

What's publication? Many journals with backlogs-to-print are good about making preprints available. Phil Quarterly is good at that, so is the Australasian Journal, and pretty much all the Springer journals (Springer handles the process centrally, so it should be all of them). J. Phil is surprisingly quick at actual publication. Journals like P&PR, which currently has a to-print backlog of 30 months, would make everyone's life easier if they followed this policy.

Edward Cokely

Hi Manuel,

If you're also considering psychology journals this might help (e.g., time, quality of feedback, rounds of revision, etc.)

http://www.journalsfeedback.org

"This project attempts to make the editorial processes of academic economics and psychology journals more transparent and to build over time a track record for most journals in these disciplines."

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment