Here are two recent pieces on neural lie detection:
WIRED: "Lie Detection Brain Scan May Be Used in [US] Court for First Time."
NeuroKuz: "Lie Detection and Neurolaw: Do Brain Scans Have a Place in the Courtroom."
As always, happy reading!
Blog Coordinator
Around the Web
- AAAS Responsibility, Human Rights, and Law
- Center for Law and the Biosciences
- Dana Foundation
- fMRI 4 Newbies
- JHU Berman Institute of Bioethics
- Neuroscience and the Law
- Penn Center for Neuroscience and Society
- PhilPapers
- SAGE Center
- Science Daily
- The Gruter Institute
- The Project on Law and Mind Sciences
- The Whole Brain Atlas
- UCSD-TV
- Wash U Neuroscience Tutorial
Neuro Blogs
- Brain Blogger
- Brain Waves
- BrainBlog
- BrainEthics
- BrainPains
- Brains
- Empirical Legal Studies
- Frontal Cortex
- Jurisdynamics
- Law and Biosciences Blog
- Legal Theory Blog
- Machines Like Us
- Mind Hacks
- Minds, Brains, and the Law
- Neuroethics & Law Blog
- Neuroethics at the Core
- Neurological Correlates
- Neurophilosophy
- Perusing Psychology
- The Law and Neuroscience Blog
- The Neurocritic
Societies
- American Psychiatric Association
- American Psychological Association
- American Psychology-Law Society
- Cognitive Neuroscience Society
- Experimental Philosophy Society (XPS)
- International Neuroethics Society
- Society for Neuroscience
- The American Philosophical Association
- The Society for Evolutionary Analysis in Law
Search
« Recent Neurolaw-related Papers | Main | Detecting Individual Memories with Neuroimaging »
05/05/2010
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0120a8bb6b2e970b014e89c8658e970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Neural Lie Detection in the News:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- The Antisocial Person
- Scientific Advances and the Death Penalty
- MAOA and Criminal Responsibility
- Neuroscience and Criminal Responsibility
- Cognitive Enhancement and Ethical Implications
- Juveniles and Punishment
- Malintent Detection and the Spectre of Pre-Crime
- The Molecular Concept of Law
- A Biological Theory of Law
- Punishing Without Free Will
Recent Comments
- Anthonia on Malintent Detection and the Spectre of Pre-Crime
- Anthonia on Neuro-criticisms by Raymond Tallis
- Ross Finesmith on Neuro-criticisms by Raymond Tallis
- Swichesheania on A Biological Theory of Law
- Welding Electrodes on Are We Responsible for Who We Are?
- Myseomedia on Punishing Without Free Will
- corrine on Punishing Without Free Will
- bielneot on Around the Web
- Garret O'Connell on United States v. Semrau
- Kelly Lowenberg on Neural Lie Detection in the News
Hi Thomas,
Following up on the case discussed in the Wired article linked above. Today, the judge excluded the fMRI lie detection evidence. I blogged about it at the Stanford CLB blog here - http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/lawandbiosciences/2010/05/05/breaking-news-fmri-lie-detection-evidence-excluded-in-ny-court-2/
Posted by: Kelly Lowenberg | 05/05/2010 at 06:52 PM